FezBaker wrote:I think FMA is responsible for getting me into drawing in the first place! I watched the original series when it was still coming out weekly, and I've followed it since- unrelated to the TV show, I think the original manga is one of the best-written manga series out there. It's pretty long, but you can tell that before she started it was written out completely- it never deviates, doesn't have rubbish filler arcs and the plot's strong from beginning right until the end.
I was hesitant to watch Brotherhood, because I love the original series so much, but it's actually overtaken the original for my favourite spot now. Although I never know what to recommend when someone wants to watch it- the original had so many beautiful moments that they couldn't do in the same way in Brotherhood (I guess because they didn't want to be seen as 'reusing' bits of script and animation)- which is a shame in a way, because it was done so perfectly in the original and not quite matched in Brotherhood. However, Broho has a much better plot as it follows the manga, and it's a lot more coherent in the end- it's also got a much more satisfying ending. I prefer the art style for the original series, but the Broho art grew on me with time, and I love the way that they age the characters up throughout the series.
I also have a secret love for the Conqueror of Shambala movie (I haven't seen the second one yet, but it sadly doesn't seem quite as good)- the CoS plot from about halfway through is absolute crap, the characters are bastardised to hell and the ending's super unsatisfying, but I absolutely love Alfons and the first half of it- plus that opening animation with the gypsies singing is super pretty!

Lapsang wrote:Oh god, I still haven't watched Brotherhood! I really should... Especially going by what FezBaker said about the ending being more satisfying.
I love the first anime but the ending always felt unresolved to me. Conqueror Of Shambala didn't really help on that front either (although, I have to admit I do still enjoy that film too, despite it's many problems).
pinkylillix wrote: Oh lawd. Completely agree about the manga; I used to follow a lot more manga regularly, but I feel like most of them would get to a point where it was just filler. And I was so reluctant to start FMA in the beginning because I was convinced it would just end up stupid and drawn out like most shonen mangas. Boy, was I wrong!
I have trouble loving the original 2003 anime these days, simply because I'm so blown away by Brotherhood, but there are elements to it that I prefer; for instance, the Nina/Shou Tucker thing had a much bigger impact on me in the 2003, mainly because Ed and Al had spent more than just a few afternoons with Nina. They had actually lived with them for a time, so it was even more heartbreaking. And I like how they knew Barry the Chopper before he became a suit of armor. Just because I have this weird love for Barry.
But overall, I do prefer Brotherhood, from everything to the story to the soundtrack to the animation, ugh. The original started to lose me when they started piling on the Dante stuff. And I felt like Sloth was just like Lust, part II. (Okay, they just wore similar outfits, but fo' serious, what was that about?) But it is what got me into FMA in the first place, so it's a'ight.![]()
Ha, I was seriously impressed when I realized Ed was actually growing taller throughout the series (in the manga/brotherhood)! Just the fact that they would pay attention to something like that. I'm so used to series where years go by and everyone looks exactly the same forever and never changes clothes and yeah.


Vitotamito wrote:FUCK Brotherhood. I'm a original series elitest. I didn't read the manga so I don't have any attachment to it.
Original Series is the most winningest shit I've ever watched.
Someone on Mangafox wrote:majeh was a legendary swordsman...
but i haven't seen him fight with a sword...
all i've ever seen is him bitch-slapping his enemies to submission...
Sonic-ock wrote:Part gorilla dick

Seven Rain wrote:I've always facepalmed at people who think being closer to the Manga = AUTOMATICALLY BETTER JUST BECAUSE, but FMA has always one of the most ridiculous instances of this for me.
I think Brotherhood looks cool and all, but the two series are COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. When purists blabber on about how being closer to the manga is better or that a new version of the anime meant to mirror the manga is better I expect differences like filler amounts and maybe a character change, name change, something minor, you know?
BUT THEY'RE LIKE TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT ANIMES. I've never once seen an episode of Brotherhood that was anything close to any episode of the orginal anime. How can people dig their heels in and call it better just because it's closer to the manga? The first anime is practically a retelling as far as I know. Would people bitch about the Escaflowne movie had the anime series been based on a manga...?
I mean don't get me wrong, you're free to like Brotherhood more than the original for any number of reasons, (I haven't had a chance to follow it all since I can't catch it on a restart/episode 1, but I for one like how there's heavier hinting at Ed x Winry, and some of the new characters seem cool,) but being faithful to the manga feels like a pretty moot point here.
By the way is Wrath even the same character in Brotherhood? He was one of my favorite homunculi in the original anime but haven't seen him in Brotherhood yet.Spoiler! :

Seven Rain wrote:We do have an Anime general thread but Aids did have a point early on in it about, and since this is a big enough series I think it should be alright to have his own thread.
I've always facepalmed at people who think being closer to the Manga = AUTOMATICALLY BETTER JUST BECAUSE, but FMA has always one of the most ridiculous instances of this for me.
I think Brotherhood looks cool and all, but the two series are COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. When purists blabber on about how being closer to the manga is better or that a new version of the anime meant to mirror the manga is better I expect differences like filler amounts and maybe a character change, name change, something minor, you know?
BUT THEY'RE LIKE TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT ANIMES. I've never once seen an episode of Brotherhood that was anything close to any episode of the orginal anime. How can people dig their heels in and call it better just because it's closer to the manga? The first anime is practically a retelling as far as I know. Would people bitch about the Escaflowne movie had the anime series been based on a manga...?
I mean don't get me wrong, you're free to like Brotherhood more than the original for any number of reasons, (I haven't had a chance to follow it all since I can't catch it on a restart/episode 1, but I for one like how there's heavier hinting at Ed x Winry, and some of the new characters seem cool,) but being faithful to the manga feels like a pretty moot point here.
*EDIT*
And speaking of canon-breaking movies, I loved the movie follow-up of the original anime.
By the way is Wrath even the same character in Brotherhood? He was one of my favorite homunculi in the original anime but haven't seen him in Brotherhood yet.Spoiler! :
xkrazydog wrote:LetMeVomitMyLoveForFMA:Brotherhood.
Arakawa is like, my art god. Her art is superb and her storytelling is absolutely fantastic. brotherhood had some DARK story plots but they never steered too far or too long from its goal. I also love the general Positivity of breaking equivalent exchange. A love between friends/family and mentors and the sacrifice your willing to go through to protect the ones you love.
Unlike in the first anime where Equivalent exchange breaking was a bad thing at the end? I was heart broken...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests