by eishiya » August 16th, 2012, 7:36 am
Are you talking about the entire blog, or just the one specific post? If the latter, link to the specific post! The front page of the confessions tumblr does change, afterall. Also, make your topic title more specific. It's uselessly generic right now.
Overall tumblr: I think most of the confessions are worded politely and the negative ones all have valid advice that the author in question could and should use. I've learned a few things from reading them, and I'm not even the one they're talking about.
That one confession on long Guest crits: I also wish people would stay logged in when posting those crits, but the thing is... if it wasn't for whiny fans of the comics in question, they probably would stay logged in! The times I've seen those kinds of anon crits, the creators tended to take them rather well, it's almost always the fans that try to white-knight that end up causing drama. The confession sounds like it was also written by one of these white knights (""even if they're not my comics").
I don't know which comic the confession is for, but I suspect it's from one of the recent rush of long guest comments on yaoi comics. I haven't read all of those crits and don't know all the comics that were commented on, but the few I've read were largely spot-on, if a bit roughly-phrased and overly-detailed.
I believe that anyone posting their comic online and free to the public should be ready both for asskissing and asskicking. If they don't want the latter, then it's their responsibility to state "No critique please" somewhere obvious. These long critiques don't seem to be posted to start drama (it's easy to start drama with far less work than such a long crit that requires reading the entire comic in question). These guest critiques, I believe, are made with the genuine intent to help the author. However, it's the author's responsibility to use that information. As I said, most of them do, and it's the people who aren't even involved in creating the work that get uppity about it.
I've had a similar situation, and I've also had a "fan" try to white-knight for me. I had the fan stop, because the critique was valid and it was not the fan's place to "defend" me from something they thought was mean. I asked for feedback, so let me have my damn feedback. Most comics I've seen that get these long guest crits also ask for feedback. In some cases, these authors don't realize what they're asking for, but I think they have only themselves to blame.
In any case, white-knighting is a stupid practice that the authors need to weed out.
As for those creators who really don't want critique:
I have no respect for them as artists and do not read their works, personally. Though I seldom offer critique on comics unless I see/get a critique request (precisely to avoid the situations described above), I have no interest in reading a comic that's pretty much guaranteed not to improve in reasonable time. In most cases, an artist who doesn't want critique is an artist who doesn't care to get better. Even critique on finished/old comics can be useful (as long as it's general and not nitpicks). Why should I read a comic that won't get better? Most of the time, comic creators who don't want crit aren't even good to begin with (at least, I've never seen a good artist/writer who is averse to crit).
In short, I stay away from their comics, and they don't get crit from me. Everybody's happy.
Busy, busy.